[Three reports are pasted below. The first one is on a fake poll that shoed Musharraf as being popular; The following two reports are on a US based Republican Institute poll donee in Pakistan that shows people want Musharraf to quit. The IRI poll is available online at http://www.iri.org/mena/pakistan/pdfs/2007-12-12-pakistan-poll.pdf]
o o o
#1.
Daily Times
December 10, 2007
Musharraf popularity poll exposed as Internet fraud
By Khalid Hasan
WASHINGTON: A public opinion poll that suggested an increase in President Pervez Musharraf’s popularity since he stepped down as army chief and became a civilian president has one major flaw: the US-based organisation that claims to have conducted the poll does not exist.
A press release issued last week claimed that according to a survey conducted by the US-based International Public Opinion Polls (IPOP), 74 percent of those surveyed had said that Pervez Musharraf would get a boost in popularity as civilian president.
The comprehensive directory of polling and survey research organisations in the United States does not list any organisation by the name of IPOP. Other than the alleged Pakistan survey, IPOP has never conducted any other polls according to its website, information confirmed through an Internet search. The IPOP website (www.ipublicpolls.com) carries no organisational details of IPOP. The PDF version of the poll posted on the website says that IPOP is located in Boston, Massachusetts, and gives its zip code as 02106, which does not exist on the US Post Office’s website.
The press release also claimed that the survey was conducted in Pakistan’s major cities via internet and telephone. Given the relatively limited access to the internet and landline telephone service in Pakistan, the methodology cited remains suspect. The IPOP poll also came up with the finding that 55 percent of those surveyed wanted Pakistan’s political parties to take part in an election under civilian President Pervez Musharraf.
Many newspapers carried the poll received via email. However, Daily Times did not publish it.
o o o
#2.
New York Times
December 13, 2007
Most Want Musharraf to Quit, Poll Shows
By DAVID ROHDE and CARLOTTA GALL
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The first comprehensive public opinion poll conducted in Pakistan since President Pervez Musharraf declared a state of emergency last month has found that 67 percent of Pakistanis want him to resign immediately and that 70 percent say his government does not deserve re-election.
The poll suggests that Mr. Musharraf will have to engage in substantial vote rigging to have the government of his choice win national elections on Jan. 8.
The survey also calls into question the view in the United States of Mr. Musharraf as a leader who can effectively rule Pakistan and deliver in the campaign against terrorism. And it suggests that civil unrest could erupt if Mr. Musharraf were to win the election.
The poll was conducted by the International Republican Institute, a nonprofit group based in Washington that is affiliated with the Republican Party and promotes democracy abroad. The results were provided to The New York Times before their release on Thursday.
Pakistan’s two main opposition leaders, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, each a former prime minister, are already accusing Mr. Musharraf of fixing the vote in advance and vowing protests if he prevails.
“If elections are rigged, we are going to need to be in a position like the people of Ukraine were, to protest those elections,” Ms. Bhutto said at a news conference last week. “A plan is under way to rig the elections, and to stop progress towards democracy.”
On Nov. 3, Mr. Musharraf declared a state of emergency, abrogated Pakistan’s Constitution, fired the Supreme Court, blacked out the independent news channels and arrested more than 5,000 of his opponents. Since then, most prisoners have been released and Mr. Musharraf has resigned from his post as army chief, but his actions have “polarized” Pakistani society, according to the poll.
Two-thirds of those surveyed “expressed anger at the current state of affairs, desired change and were anti-Musharraf,” the institute said. And one third “remained supportive of President Musharraf and were positive about the condition of the country.”
An American-backed proposal that Mr. Musharraf form a government with Ms. Bhutto also appears to be deeply unpopular. Sixty percent of Pakistanis polled opposed such a deal, which American officials had hoped would bolster support for Mr. Musharraf.
Instead, 58 percent said they would support a “Grand Opposition Alliance” among Ms. Bhutto, Mr. Sharif and other parties against Mr. Musharraf, a former general who seized power in a 1999 coup. Fifty-six percent said the army, which has intermittently ruled Pakistan since it won independence from Britain 60 years ago, should have no role in civilian government.
If Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif do not form an alliance, the country appears to be headed toward a hung Parliament, according to the poll. Asked which party they would support in elections, 30 percent of those polled said they would support Ms. Bhutto’s party, 25 percent named Mr. Sharif’s and 23 percent favored Mr. Musharraf’s.
The poll was based on the responses of 3,520 randomly selected men and women from across Pakistan, according to the institute. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.69 percentage points.
“If they did unite, they would put themselves in a much stronger position,” said Robert Varsalone, the institute’s country director, referring to Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif.
But the two are bitter personal rivals and, according to Pakistani political analysts, unlikely to be able to form a government together. They predicted continued political instability if no party wins the vote decisively, with Mr. Musharraf, Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif all vying to cobble together governing coalitions with smaller parties.
The poll also identified several worrying trends for Mr. Musharraf’s party. Seventy percent of Pakistanis said they felt the country was headed in the wrong direction and 51 percent said their personal economic situation had worsened. And Mr. Sharif, who returned to Pakistan from exile two weeks ago, appears to be drawing center-right voters away from Mr. Musharraf, a key source of his support.
Pakistani and Western observers warn that clear signs already exist that Mr. Musharraf and his supporters are manipulating the election. They fear a repeat of nationwide elections won by Mr. Musharraf’s party in 2002.
“It was Pakistan’s most rigged election,” said Ijaz Gilani, chairman of Gallup Pakistan, an Islamabad-based polling and research firm. “Never in our history have we had so much pre-poll and post-poll rigging.”
The irregularities were numerous, according to the opposition and observers, including education requirements that knocked opposition candidates off the ballot and the severe gerrymandering of districts in favor of Mr. Musharraf’s supporters. Long before the race, Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif had been forced into exile, weakening the ability of their parties to function.
As the race approached, Mr. Musharraf took over much of Mr. Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League. He also passed a requirement that all candidates have a university degree, a measure that knocked some of Ms. Bhutto’s and Mr. Sharif’s strongest candidates off the ballot.
Ikram Sehgal, a defense analyst and retired army pilot who runs a security company, said government and intelligence officials also engaged in “post-poll rigging,” pressing successful candidates from other parties to defect.
“They would say: ‘You have not paid your taxes, here are the bills. These are the corruption cases against you,’ ” he said.
This year, the country’s election commission, judiciary and local governments are all run by officials loyal to Mr. Musharraf. Analysts say the president has used the state of emergency to create an electoral playing field that favors his candidates, constraining media coverage, public rallies and the length of the campaign.
The dismissal and continued detention of Supreme Court and High Court judges “sent a very strong signal” that election results could not be appealed, according an election observer who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Instead of the standard 60-day campaign, candidates will have only three weeks after emergency rule, which is expected to end this weekend. Restrictions will remain against rallies and processions, which are only permitted in proscribed places.
And Mr. Musharraf has muzzled the country’s news media, barring live coverage of election rallies and popular political talk shows. Under a new ordinance unilaterally enacted by Mr. Musharraf under emergency rule, television journalists face up to three years in jail for broadcasting “anything which defames or brings into ridicule the head of state.”
In a letter to stations on Monday, government officials accused them of airing live telephone calls from the public that contained “baseless propaganda against Pakistan and incite people to violence.” If the practice continued, they said, station owners and journalists could be jailed.
Fears also exist that government resources are being used in favor of election candidates. The nazim, or district mayor, who controls the local government officials running polling stations, can oversee rigging, Mr. Sehgal said. Opposition parties have demanded they be replaced by neutral officials during the election campaign.
Mr. Sehgal also said law enforcement agencies could shutter polling stations where opposition candidates were expected to do well on the pretext that there were disturbances. “The police find out where they could lose a polling station and they close it early,” he said. “And they put the votes of their party in the box.”
And after ballots are cast, there are concerns about how the vote will be tallied, according to the election observer. Political party observers may be barred from election centers where results from across the constituency will be totaled. “It’s a huge deficiency,” he said.
On Wednesday, Aitzaz Ahsan, a top lawyer who has been under house arrest during the state of emergency was imposed, announced that he was pulling out of the election, in deference to the lawyers who have sought a boycott of elections until the former Supreme Court is restored.
He and other lawyers predict the vote will be rigged. Mr. Sehgal estimates that Pervez Elahi, the former chief minister of Punjab Province and the leading candidate from Mr. Musharraf’s party, can secure 100 seats in Punjab by virtue of his control of government machinery there.
Without rigging, he would only get 45 to 50 seats, he said. Mr. Gilani said his polling has shown 20 percent support for Mr. Musharraf’s party after the emergency.
o o o
#3
Musharraf is criticised in survey
President Musharraf is sworn in
Mr Musharraf insists January parliamentary polls will go ahead
An international opinion poll of Pakistanis suggests widespread public opposition to President Musharraf's re-election as president.
Most people are also critical of the imposition of the state of emergency.
The poll was carried out by the US-based International Republican Institute (IRI).
Meanwhile the president's lawyers say that he will soon lift the state of emergency, but only after ensuring that he cannot be brought before a court.
Public anger
The IRI say that their field workers interviewed more than 3,500 adults across Pakistan in what was the first broad survey of public opinion since President Musharraf declared a state of emergency on 3 November.
It suggests widespread public anger about the measures taken by him.
Protesting lawyers in Pakistan
The president has often been at loggerheads with the judiciary
More than 70% of those questioned said they did not support the President's re-election for another five year term.
Two-thirds said they wanted him to resign.
There was also strong opposition to the state of emergency itself - 70% of the people questioned said it should not have been declared.
A consistent majority - always more than 70% - opposed each of the main restrictions imposed by the state of emergency.
These include the suspension of the constitution, the ban on political rallies, the detention of the former Supreme Court judges and the curbs on the media.
Two-thirds of people surveyed said they thought the president's reason for the state of emergency was not to fight terrorism but to stop the Supreme Court from over-turning his re-election.
Important steps
The president does still command some support but from a minority of about a quarter to a third.
The BBC's Jill McGivering in Islamabad says that this snapshot of opinion is already slightly out of date.
Police in Pakistan
The president says some of his actions have been unconstitutional
The opinions were sampled in November - after the imposition of the state of emergency - but before President Musharraf took other important steps such as standing down as head of the army and confirming that elections would go ahead in January.
It was also completed before he said that would end the state of emergency on 15 December.
Conceded
In a separate development, the president has formalised arrangements made last month to alter the constitution to ensure that decisions made during his term of office will be immune from legal challenges.
The president has conceded that measures he took to purge the judiciary, imprison political opponents and restrain the media were unconstitutional.
But he argues they were necessary to prevent political chaos and give the authorities more power to act against Islamic militants.
The president is expected to ensure the immunity measures are in place before he lifts the state of emergency.
